Statbel · SCB · INSEE · ONS · ABS · ČSÚ · National Statistics 2023

Immigrants & Employment:
20-Country Official StatisticsGap ranges −20pp to −3pp

In all 20 countries, immigrants have lower employment rates than native-born residents. Belgium −20pp (largest), Czechia −3pp (smallest). Gap reflects intake policy, migrant profile, and integration systems.

🌐 日本語Primary official sources only

Employment rate gap across 20 countries (2023)

Employment rate gap: immigrants vs. native-born (percentage points, 2023)
Belgium 🇧🇪-20pt
Finland 🇫🇮-18pt
Sweden 🇸🇪-16pt
France 🇫🇷-16pt
Netherlands 🇳🇱-15pt
Denmark 🇩🇰-14.5pt
Germany 🇩🇪-13pt
Norway 🇳🇴-12pt
Austria 🇦🇹-11pt
Portugal 🇵🇹-9pt
United Kingdom 🇬🇧-8pt
Spain 🇪🇸-8pt
Canada 🇨🇦-7pt
Switzerland 🇨🇭-7pt
Ireland 🇮🇪-6pt
Italy 🇮🇹-5pt
New Zealand 🇳🇿-5pt
United States 🇺🇸-4pt
Australia 🇦🇺-4pt
Czech Republic 🇨🇿-3pt
Source: National statistics offices (Statbel, SCB, INSEE, ONS, etc.) 2023

Key data points by primary source

CountryGap (pp)Source
Belgium−20Statbel 2023
Finland−18Statistics Finland 2023
Sweden−16SCB 2023
France−16INSEE 2023
United Kingdom−8ONS 2023
Australia−4ABS 2023
Czech Republic−3ČSÚ 2023

Methodological limits

  • Qualification levels not controlled: Immigrant and native-born populations have different educational distributions. A higher share of low-education workers will reduce employment rates regardless of origin.
  • Length of residence not controlled: Recent arrivals require time for language acquisition, credential recognition, and network building. Long-term residents show narrower gaps, but aggregate statistics conflate these groups.
  • Heterogeneous migrant categories: EU labour migrants, refugees, and skilled migrants have fundamentally different employment profiles. Differences in the composition of immigrant populations explain part of the cross-country variation in gap size.
  • Country-specific definitions of "immigrant": Whether foreign-born, foreign nationals, or second-generation migrants are included varies across national statistical systems.

What this data does not show

  • The employment gap is not evidence of discrimination against immigrants. Discrimination may exist, but educational attainment, language proficiency, length of residence, and credential recognition issues are simultaneously at work and cannot be disaggregated from the statistics alone.
  • A large gap does not indicate immigration policy failure. Countries receiving large numbers of refugees tend to show larger gaps — this reflects the characteristics of refugees (origin in conflict zones, starting from zero in the host-country language), not policy effectiveness.
  • Smaller gaps in Czech Republic or Australia do not directly prove superior integration policy. The composition of migrant inflows (high share of skilled workers) and pre-arrival selection processes are major contributing factors.
  • The employment rate gap does not automatically translate into a net economic drag. Immigrants simultaneously increase labour supply and aggregate demand; the net effect on overall employment cannot be read off from the gap figure alone.

Primary sources