Czechia

1. Official institutions

2. Key datasets

3. Demographics

3.1 Current population composition

Share of foreign nationals in the population (December 31, 2025)
89.62%
10.38%
  • Czech nationals89.62%
  • Foreign nationals10.38%
Source: ČSÚ, "Cizinci" (Foreigners)

3.2 Breakdown by nationality

Breakdown of foreign nationals by nationality (December 31, 2025)
54.2%
11.1%
21%
  • Ukraine54.2%
  • Slovakia11.1%
  • Vietnam6.2%
  • Russia3.3%
  • Other EU member states21%
  • Other4.2%
Source: ČSÚ, "Počet cizinců, demografické události"

3.3 Immigration waves (1950s – present)

📊A precise year-by-year and nationality-by-nationality time series of the foreign population from the 1950s to 2021 (ČSÚ DataStat/VDB tables), and an age structure breakdown by origin (population pyramid), are planned for a future update. The ČSÚ data product 'Cizinci podle státního občanství, věku a pohlaví' could not be directly confirmed with specific figures during this research.

3.4 Age structure

📊An age structure breakdown by nationality or origin (population pyramid) is planned for a future update. ČSÚ publishes an overall sex ratio (47.8% women among foreigners at the end of 2025), but an age breakdown by origin could not be directly confirmed from a primary source during this research.

3.5 Long-term projection

📊A long-term population projection for Czechia broken down by origin is planned for a future update. No primary source equivalent to Statistics Denmark's Befolkningsfremskrivning, with a projected foreign-population share broken down by origin, could be confirmed during this research.

4. Public finances — net cost

Fiscal balance related to Ukrainian temporary protection beneficiaries (Q3 2025, estimate)
Tax and social contribution revenue+82 bn CZK/quarter
Related public spending-39 bn CZK/quarter
Source: Consortium of NGOs working with migrants (Konsorcium nevládních organizací pracujících s migranty)

⚠️ Limits Czechia has no comprehensive net fiscal contribution calculation broken down by origin and length of residence comparable to the Danish Ministry of Finance. Only partial estimates for the Ukrainian temporary protection scheme are available — not a long-term, systematic, country-wide analysis.

4.1 Pension system / contributor-to-pensioner ratio

📊A demographic dependency ratio (pensioners and children relative to working-age population) broken down by origin for Czechia is planned for a future update. No primary source from ČSÚ or the Ministry of Finance (MF ČR) with a breakdown by nationality could be confirmed during this research.

5. Labor market

Occupational structure of Ukrainian temporary protection beneficiaries, before vs. after migration (2024 survey)
Specialists (before, in Ukraine)+45%
Specialists (after, in Czechia)+16%
Unskilled labor (before)+3%
Unskilled labor (after)+15%
Source: Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, "Hlas Ukrajinců" survey

6. Security / justice

⚠️ Limits These statistics aggregate all foreign nationalities (EU and non-EU, long-term residents and recent arrivals, including Ukrainian temporary protection) without a systematic breakdown by migration status in publicly available publications.

7. Education

173,121
Foreign-national students enrolled across the Czech education system, 2024/2025 school year (7.49% of total enrollment)

8. Housing

about one-third
Share of all foreigners residing in the Czech Republic who live in Prague

9. Social cohesion

📊A comparable and up-to-date official or peer-reviewed academic survey measuring Czech public perception of post-2022 Ukrainian immigration is planned for a future update, if a dedicated Eurobarometer or STEM/CVVM survey is located and verified.

10. Recent political context

11. Data limitations and biases

⚠️ Limits Czechia is an atypical case in this list (historically very low non-European immigration) and should be treated as a counter-example rather than a “crisis” case in cross-country synthesis. Statistics that aggregate Ukrainian temporary protection beneficiaries with “regular” immigration (labor, family, asylum) without distinction can be misleading — this page separates the two wherever possible.